Micro:bit to develop computational thinking in students between 7 and 14 years old
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56200/mried.v4i12.10302Keywords:
Computational thinking, Micro:bit, skill development, programming, problem solvingAbstract
This work involved the analysis of the use of the Micro:bit tool for developing computational thinking (CT) among students from third to ninth grade of basic education at Unidad Educativa Rey Sabio Salomón. A mixed methodology was applied, using a pre-experimental design with multiple groups, including pre-tests and post-tests. A total of 58 students and 9 teachers participated in the study. Data collection was carried out using closed-ended Likert-type questionnaires. The findings revealed motivation and proficiency in programming skills among lower-grade students (third to fourth grade), showing strengths in problem-solving, logical thinking, and pattern recognition, with achievement levels ranging from 66.7% to 80%. However, in the middle grades (fifth to seventh), only 40% of the students demonstrated competence in managing control structures. In the upper grades (eighth to ninth), students showed difficulty understanding advanced concepts such as variables, sensors, and compound logic, with misunderstanding levels reaching 85.7%. It is concluded that Micro:bit serves as an effective resource for fostering computational thinking across all age groups, provided that the content is progressively adapted to students' cognitive levels. The study supports a gradual integration of computational thinking into the school curriculum.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Corrales Álvarez, M., Ocampo, L. M., y Cardona Torres, S. A. (2024). Definiciones del pensamiento computacional. Revista EIA, 21(42), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v21i42.1716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v21i42.1716
Monge Fallas , J., Sancho Chavarría, L., Garita Rodríguez , C., González Torres, A., y Trejos Zelaya, I. (2025). Fundamentos y perspectivas del pensamiento computacional. Tecnología en Marcha, 38(1), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v38i1.7055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v38i1.7055
Agencia de Calidad de la Educación. (2024, Oxtubre). Informe de calidad educativa: una mirada a las habilidades para el siglo XXI. agenciaeducacion: https://archivos.agenciaeducacion.cl/informe+de+calidad+educativa_v2(091024).pdf
Cervera Manjarrez, N., Oquendo González, E. J., Velásquez Pérez, Y., y Rose Parra, C. (2023). Principios y estrategias para el desarrollo del pensamiento computacional. CIENCIAMATRIA, 9(17), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.35381/cm.v9i17.1128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35381/cm.v9i17.1128
Cueva, T., Jara , O., Arias, J., y Flores, F. (2023). Métodos Mixtos de Investigación. Creative Commons. https://doi.org/10.35622/inudi.b.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35622/inudi.b.106
Moreno Navarro, J. J., & Raj Moriche, M. (2024). Una experiencia real de uso de Micro:bit para el pensamiento computacional en educación secundaria. Reposiorio Universidad de Alicante: https://rua.ua.es/entities/publication/d905f7ec-c139-48bb-a044-c64974b42212
Moreno Palma, N., Berral Ortiz, B., Fernández Fernández, C. R., y Victoria Maldonado, J. J. (2025). Pensamiento Computacional en la Educación Básica a través de la Robótica Educativa: Una Revisión Sistemática. European Public&Social innovation Review, 10, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1099
Ortega Mendoza, J. D. (2022). Estudio de caso del desarrollo de Pensamiento Computacional en estudiantes de quinto grado de primaria a través de la utilización de la tarjeta micro: bit, 10(13), 63-68. https://doi.org/ 10.22267/runin
Pagllacho Churochumbi, J. T., Egüez Chiriboga, B. F., y Reyes Romero, L. E. (2024). La herramineta Scratch Jr. como metología para el desarrollo del pensamiento computacional. Revista Odigos, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.35290/ro.v5n3.2024.1425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35290/ro.v5n3.2024.1425
Quezada, L., Jiménez, R., y Yanangómez, V. (2022). Desarrollo Del Pensamiento Computacional Mediante El Uso De La Robótica Educativa Como Estrategia. Instituto Superior Tecnológico Loja: https://revista.tecnologicoloja.edu.ec/index.php/inicio/article/view/15/12
Ramos Galarza, C. (2021). Diseños de investigación experimental. CienciAmerica, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.33210/ca.v10i1.356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33210/ca.v10i1.356
Rojas, L., & Aravena, M. (2023). Pensamiento computacional en la educación:aprendizajes y desempeño acádemico. Revista Franz Tamayo, 5(13), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.61287/revistafranztamayo.v.5i13.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61287/revistafranztamayo.v.5i13.1
Segovia Baus, F. (2022). Revista para el aula. Universidada San Francisco de Quito: https://www.usfq.edu.ec/sites/default/files/2023-01/pea-044-006.pdf?itok=xq3CVmPMlq
Universidad Isabel l. (2023, 11 07). ¿Qué es el pensamiento computacional? Universidad Isabel l: https://www.ui1.es/blog-ui1/que-es-el-pensamiento-computacional#:~:text=El%20pensamiento%20computacional%20es%20una,limita%20a%20saber%20escribir%20c%C3%B3digo.
Velázquez Iturbide, J., & Lope Mercedes, M. (2021). Análisis del “pensamiento computacional” desde una perspectiva educativa. RED: revista de educación a distancia,, 21(68). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.484811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/red.484811
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Freddy Alexander Caiza Ojeda , Jessica Paola Oña Vásquez , Carlos Eduardo Salazar Guaña

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.





































+593987341121 Email: rjposso@revistamentor.ec