Expanded pedagogical mediation: generative artificial intelligence outside the classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56200/mentor.v5i5.13546Keywords:
pedagogical mediation, generative artificial intelligence, teacher role, sociotechnical approachAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence began to be used in teaching activities outside the classroom, but the literature on these uses was exploratory and did not link them to pedagogical mediation. The objective of the review was to analyze how the incorporation of generative artificial intelligence into teaching activities developed outside the classroom was presented in the literature, and which implications emerged for pedagogical mediation and the role of teachers in planning and educational design processes. A narrative review was conducted through targeted searches, in Spanish and English, in open-access sources, including peer-reviewed articles, academic books, and reports from international organizations. The analysis was organized into three axes: pedagogical mediation as a sociotechnical space, the out-of-class use of generative artificial intelligence, and the redefinition of the teaching role. The review made it possible to suggest that these systems supported planning and resource design, although they required verification, contextual adaptation, and ethical criteria, and that the teaching role was redefined without the literature establishing its replacement. From this integration, expanded pedagogical mediation was derived, an interpretive proposal that placed the use of these systems within a broader pedagogical relationship.
Downloads
References
Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003
Bouakaz, L., & Khalid, S. (2025). AI in education: A sociological exploration of technology in learning environments. Frontiers in Education, 10, Artículo 1700876. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1700876
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines (Versión 2.2). http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Dron, J. (2023a). How education works: Teaching, technology, and technique. Athabasca University Press.
Dron, J. (2023b). The human nature of generative AIs and the technological nature of humanity: Implications for education. Digital, 3(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital3040020
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Gimeno Sacristán, J., & Pérez Gómez, Á. I. (1995). Comprender y transformar la enseñanza (4.ª ed.). Morata.
Gutiérrez Pérez, F., & Prieto Castillo, D. (1993). La mediación pedagógica: Apuntes para una educación a distancia alternativa (2.ª ed.). Instituto de Investigaciones y Mejoramiento Educativo; Radio Nederland Training Center.
Hashem, R., Ali, N., El Zein, F., Fidalgo, P., & Abu Khurma, O. (2024). AI to the rescue: Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a teacher ally for workload relief and burnout prevention. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19, Artículo 023. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19023
Hevia Martínez, G. (2019). La sociedad como artefacto: Sistemas sociotécnicos, sociotecnologías y sociotécnicas. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad – CTS, 14(40), 267–295. https://ojs.revistacts.net/index.php/CTS/article/view/102
Holstein, K., & Aleven, V. (2022). Designing for human–AI complementarity in K-12 education. AI Magazine, 43(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12058
Karaman, M. R., & Göksu, I. (2024). Are lesson plans created by ChatGPT more effective? An experimental study. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.607
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Artículo 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.006
Letrud, K. (2012). A rebuttal of NTL Institute's learning pyramid. Education, 133(1), 117–124. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ996977
Lobo, A. (2025, 27 de septiembre). Mediación pedagógica: El docente como puente hacia el conocimiento. Actos en la Escuela. https://actosenlaescuela.com/mediacion-pedagogica/
Malagón Terrón, F. J. (2009). [Reseña del libro La mediación pedagógica: Apuntes para una educación a distancia alternativa, de F. Gutiérrez Pérez y D. Prieto Castillo]. Mediaciones Sociales, 5, 175–180. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/MESO/en/article/download/MESO0909220175A/21194/0
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
OECD. (2025). Results from TALIS 2024: Chile [Nota por país]. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/results-from-talis-2024-country-notes_e127f9e2-en/chile_e31949b6-en.html
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
Prieto Castillo, D. (2020). Volver a la pedagogía. Innovaciones Educativas, 22(Número especial), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v22iespecial.3158
Radtke-Bederode, I., & Meireles-Ribeiro, L. O. (2025). Plataformización educativa con IA generativa: Impactos en la autonomía docente. Alteridad, 20(2), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v20n2.2025.02
Rojas Rivero, N. C. (2016). Formación del docente y pedagogía de la complejidad en el contexto de la educación. Revista Scientific, 1(1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2016.1.1.14.249-265
Romani Pillpe, G., Macedo Inca, K. S., Soto Loza, G. E., Franco Guevara, A. M., & Ore Choque, M. K. (2025). Revisión sistemática de inteligencia artificial generativa (GenIA) para el diseño de experiencias de aprendizaje, 2020-2025. Revista Espacios, 46(3), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a25v46n03p02
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
UNESCO. (2019). Marco de competencias de los docentes en materia de TIC elaborado por la UNESCO: Versión 3. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371024
van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), Artículo 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens – With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lizbeth Otilia Rubio Fernández

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.






























+593987341121 