Occupational psychosocial risks and indicators of adverse effects on academic persistence among working students in the SEA-UV Business Administration program: A correlational study

Authors

  • Luz Daniela Arguelles Hernández Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa Veracruz-México https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9070-2214
  • Ismael Guzman Barrera Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa Veracruz-México https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7192-2958

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56200/mentor.v5i5.13522

Keywords:

Open Education, Student-Workers, Psychosocial Risks, Academic Retention, Educational Management.

Abstract

Students enrolled in the Open Education System of Universidad Veracruzana (SEA-UV) often combine academic demands with work and family responsibilities. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between occupational psychosocial risk factors and indicators of adverse effects on academic persistence among working students enrolled in the SEA-UV Business Administration program. A quantitative, correlational, and cross-sectional study was conducted. The instrument, adapted from NOM-035-STPS-2018, assessed workload, working hours, work–study–family interference, and workplace support, as well as indicators associated with academic persistence. The sample consisted of 40 students who were employed at the time of the study. Spearman’s rho correlations showed that work–study–family interference had the strongest association with adverse effects on academic persistence (ρ = .692, p < .001), followed by working hours (ρ = .423, p = .007) and workload (ρ = .334, p = .035). Workplace support showed an inverse relationship (ρ = −.532, p < .001). In addition, 87.5% of participants reported being committed to completing their degree. It is concluded that adverse effects on academic persistence were primarily associated with work–study–family interference, as well as with working hours and workload, whereas greater workplace support was associated with fewer academic difficulties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luz Daniela Arguelles Hernández, Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa Veracruz-México

Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa Veracruz-México

Ismael Guzman Barrera , Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa Veracruz-México

Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa Veracruz-México

References

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Bui, B. C. (2025). Striving for college success: The persistence of students who work off-campus. Innovative Higher Education, 50(6), 1945–1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-025-09834-9

Díaz-Patiño, D.-G., & Anaya-Velasco, A. (2022). Relación de los factores de riesgo psicosocial y salud en trabajadores de universidades: Revisión sistemática. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 13(38), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2022.38.1518

Finkel, L., Parra Contreras, P., & Carbonell Asins, J. A. (2024). ¿Estudias y trabajas? Perfiles del estudiantado universitario y estrategias para la compatibilización. Revista Española de Sociología, 33(2), Article a224. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2024.224

Gutović, V., Bouckaert, M., Xia, T., Quinteiro Goris, J. A., Baroni Boces, G., Sears, M. D., Peterson, M. S., & Osei, E. (2026). Higher education global trends report: Towards inclusive, equitable and quality higher education in an internationally mobile landscape. UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000398121

OECD. (2019). The future of Mexican higher education: Promoting quality and equity. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264309371-en

Remenick, L., & Bergman, M. (2021). Support for working students: Considerations for higher education institutions. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 69(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1777381

Rojas-Mata, I., Suárez-Escalona, R., & Cavazos-Salazar, R. L. (2022). Factores de riesgo psicosocial en trabajadores universitarios: Un estudio comparativo antes y durante el COVID-19. CienciaUAT, 17(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.29059/cienciauat.v17i1.1583

Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social. (2018). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-035-STPS-2018, Factores de riesgo psicosocial en el trabajo—Identificación, análisis y prevención. Diario Oficial de la Federación. https://asinom.stps.gob.mx/upload/nom/48.pdf

Téllez Ramírez, M. del R., Ruiz Velázquez, I. A., Téllez Neria, F. O., & Moreno González, S. (2025). Análisis de los factores de riesgo psicosocial en estudiantes de nivel superior. Pistas Educativas, 47(150), 209–223. https://pistaseducativas.celaya.tecnm.mx/index.php/pistas/article/view/3984/2781

Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. University of Chicago Press.

Published

20.10.2026

How to Cite

Arguelles Hernández, L. D., & Guzman Barrera , I. (2026). Occupational psychosocial risks and indicators of adverse effects on academic persistence among working students in the SEA-UV Business Administration program: A correlational study. MENTOR Revista De investigación Educativa Y Deportiva , 5(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56200/mentor.v5i5.13522